- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America1000 01:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Langrial clan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability. All the clan articles in the category of 'Jat Clans of Punjab' face the same issue. Most of them are as if there are listed in a clans directory, WP:NOT. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Even discounting the usual unreliable Raj sources, the mirrors and unreliable modern sources such as B. S. Nijjar and S. N. Sadasivan, there appear to be quite a lot of references. Alas, they're mostly GBooks snippet views here but, for example, passing mention, Christophe Jaffrelot, someone who may or may not be reliable, Beckerlegge. These sources are all suggesting that the Langrial are a "dominant" tribe in their region etc, so I suspect there is more information out there. - Sitush (talk) 16:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.