- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lance Fresh[edit]
- Lance Fresh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCREATIVE. Edwardx (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A stub-level stub. Completely unsourced. He works for Bleacher Report apparently, but zero sources found that help prove notability, other than interviews he's done, and a gossip-column type thing about him wearing a nice hat in the New York Times. Oaktree b (talk) 19:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete an unsourced article with no substance.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 12:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom lacks sources fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.