The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT topics and Confucianism[edit]

LGBT topics and Confucianism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was nominated for deletion in October 2008 and "kept" at that time. Since then, no additional text has been added, no additional source has been added. While no longer original research, the assertions are still largely unverified due to its use of a single source (and that single source's own speculative nature). The topic can be more than adequately dealt with in Homosexuality and religion. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 03:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The prior discussion was not automatically linked: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homosexuality and Confucianism

• Delete or Merge I would say merge into another article, but I've looked around and can find nothing to verify the information in the article beyond that one source. homosexuality in china might be a better place for this information (avoiding the philosophy vs. religion debate) if more sources can be found. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the Confucianism section of Homosexuality and religion -- I already copied the text from this article to that section to facilitate a redirection. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 02:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That seems a little like circumventing the process. Are you that sure the information is reliable enough to be in any article? Wickedjacob (talk) 07:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is simple nonsense written to flesh out Template:Religion and LGBT topics. Remove this article from that template; it does not stand alone and there is nothing to be said here. Shii (tock) 02:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No need for separate article. Almost all the information here is the same information in the numerous other related articles.

--Bobbyd2011 (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.