- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Kush (word) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was contested in a WP:PROD, but is clearly a dictionary definition of a persian word. Most of the definitions included in the article have their own articles, linked to in the disambiguation page. Should be deleted per WP:NAD and any useful content merged into the appropriate pages. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 00:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC) 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 00:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per NAD. It's not simply a dictionary definition; it's a list of Persian, Urdu, and other words (and their definitions) containing the consonants ش and ک (/ʃ/ and /k/). That makes it less encyclopedic, not more so, in my opinion. I prodded it, as it had the ((disambiguation)) template but no ambiguous links. User:PamD removed the prod, noting that it was not actually a DAB page. Cnilep (talk) 01:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 02:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 02:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.