The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - TP 03:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kunststoff 23 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I only found two copies of the Wikipedia article in searches. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No significant coverage in reliable sources. Not a notable band per WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Mattg82 (talk) 19:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This article does not have reliable sources which establish this topic's notability. I was not able to find signicant coverage. Folgertat (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.