The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kunal_Pradhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia. The said author is not well known and certainly not a "leading writer". Naon34561 (talk) 08:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Only hits from reliable sources are articles written by him, not articles about him [1]. Subtracting out "by Kunal Pradhan" from the GNews hits leaves merely 14 articles, of which over half aren't even for the same person [2]. cab (talk) 08:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 08:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - lacks secondary sources to support a position as a notable columnist. TerriersFan (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not at all famous. Tintin 13:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.