The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Krieghoff Model L

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable firearm. Online search turned up no reliable sources. Created by User:Ctway sock. ansh 666 01:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 01:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 01:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 01:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete...The only info that I can find on this guy are Wiki mirrors and some photos. I think that at this point it is only notable to a WW2 memorabilia collectors. It's only two sentences long. I say we delete it for now. If someone wants to bring it back later with some references, I'm OK with that too.--RAF910 (talk) 01:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no indications of notability nor sufficient RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, could mention on a list page for World War II German weapons, but otherwise, not notable for stand alone article, not even a stub. As noted, no RS sources, either. Kierzek (talk) 18:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.