The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kona 4C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about a row of chairs. Unverifiable by readers and does not demonstrate why this seating area is notable. Contested prod, so bringing here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 21:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Utterly non-notable. Colonel Tom 21:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable chairs. Give the chairs "the chair"! VictorianMutant^(Talk) 00:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Absolutely non notable seating. Safiel (talk) 03:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nonsense and unencyclopedic article. Keb25 (talk) 04:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect (whether deleting beforehand or not) to Tuanku Abdul Rahman Stadium as it's a valid search term. But it's clearly not notable for its own article. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's a reasonable comment, but are the seats so notable in themselves that people would specifically search for them by name? ClaretAsh 10:25, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think so, if it is a well-recognised section of a stadium that seats "Ultras". Of course, I fully agree they're not notable seats, only that they're likely to be well-known enough that people might punch them into our search bar. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as the initial prodder, even though my view now seems redundant after this rain of Deletes. ClaretAsh 10:25, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable. There's no reason to have an article on Wikipedia about a row of chairs. DinosaurDan (talk) 22:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the above; no clear notability. I'm not sold on the idea of a redirect, but redirects are cheap; we can always argue about it at RFD after the fact. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 15:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.