The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Koimoi[edit]

Koimoi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent coverage in reliable source.Fails subject notability guidelines.It may be noted that WP:USEBYOTHERS is not a criterion of encyclopedic inclusion. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 07:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 07:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 07:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Confused: Elaborate your nomination. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 01:35, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep another article about a source that is used in at least 500 articles so the public would expect at least a brief explanation of what it is so they can judge whether it is reliable for themselves. Fixed the dead link ref in the article here but unfortunately its pr. Haven't done a major rs search yet so only a weak keep Atlantic306 (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.