The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. If someone wants to work on it in draft space, just let me know. Star Mississippi 15:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Young-geun

[edit]
Kim Young-geun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of individual notability, not fleshed out and unlikely to be in near future. Also this user (User:Kisuga) has created [1] over 200 of these kinds of articles. I don't know how to handle this; can someone give a recommendation? Is it possible to speedy delete many of them? toobigtokale (talk) 09:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.