The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - still delete for now despite cleanup, don't think the PNC at WP:N is met. One of the links is in an advertising paper, which doesn't prove much, and the other is a pretty trivial reference. Only really one acceptable source per WP:N, and we need more than 1. But this could change if the article gets expanded and more sources are found. MoreschiRequest a recording?23:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- No matter how much it is despammed, it will still be non-notable. ~~Eugene2xSign here ☺ ~~23:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.