The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Khadafi Dub

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears to fail the guidelines of WP:NMUSIC. There are no independent references in the current article to address notability and an independent search on GNews and GBooks shows nothing to demonstrate significant impact. General searches show promotional matches of the type one would expect of an MC and performer. PROD previously raised and removed but without a clear rationale or with any prospect of immediate improvement, so raising for wider discussion of notability. Fæ (talk) 22:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources, non-notable, single author/editor, fails wp:npov and wp:blp - not even wp:band. Ding 'em. --CompRhetoric (talk) 22:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original prodder. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 19:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources are extremely questionable, mainly self published sources. LibStar (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.