The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kazuhiro Ito

[edit]
Kazuhiro Ito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete. Subject is a student. He has not appeared in a major role with any notable professional opera companies. The awards that he has won are not notable. He may well acheive notability in the future by appearing as a soloist with notable Japanese opera companies such as the New National Theatre, Tokyo, the Nikikai or the Fujiwara but this evidently hasn't happened yet. His only claim to fame is apparently his own (rather sophisticated) web site. Kleinzach (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC) amended --Kleinzach (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a time lag between the listing on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Opera/to_do_full_list#Articles_needing_Expert_Attention and this afd, however it may be a mistake by the bot because I can't see that there has ever been an 'expert attention needed' tag put on this article. Regarding being a student the text says: "he has been working and studying in Milan, Italy " . (I should add that I put a notability tag on this earlier but it was simply removed without any improvement made to the article.) -- Kleinzach (talk) 13:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where does it say he performed in Germany and Italy? I can't see any reference to this. -- Kleinzach (talk) 12:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
His web page. Neier (talk) 14:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neier, by "WP:MUSIC #4 for performers", do you mean: "Has received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country."? If so, I don't think this is the case here. He's had some isolated performances in not particularly distinguished roles/venues, some of which may not have even been 'professional', i.e., he wasn't paid for them. (See my comment below) And so far there's zero coverage, let alone non-trivial coverage. Voceditenore (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is what I was referring to. There is a Japanese wikipedia article that I added the transwiki link to. Generally, since they're much tighter about who gets articles, that's enough to push me over to the side of keep; but, the article is even shorter than ours; and since Google turns up very little in Japanese, nothing in Italian, and mostly articles about a ?kickboxer? with the same name in German pages, I'm staying on the fence here. Neier (talk) 14:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've just looked at his Japanese pages and you are right there is more information (I read Japanese albeit very slowly), but I can't find any notable engagements - let alone any media reports on them. Re 'corroborating his claims', I don't think he is a fake. Merely that he is so far non-notable.
There are probably 40 or 50 'professional' opera singers in Tokyo who regularly appear for the main companies there. Almost all these singers have to supplement their income teaching so in reality they are only semi-professional. (None of them as far as I know have pages on WP.) Anyway the point is that I can see no evidence that Ito is up to that level yet - and even if he were it's an open question whether he would meet our criteria here. -- Kleinzach (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't think he's a fake either. By "corroborating", I meant corroborating the fact that he or his performances were sufficiently notable for someone else to have written about them in a non-trivial way. Certainly the performances in Italy wouldn't qualify as "professional". They were put on by a music school in Erba (Accademia Europea di Musica). My personal view is that he isn't really notable enough for an article. At the moment, I'd say delete, although I'd change my mind if something earth-shattering comes up. Voceditenore (talk) 14:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.