The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Karina evleri[edit]

Karina evleri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable building development. Prodded as non-notable, as not promotional enough for speedy - prod removed. The buildings are an interesting shape, but so are most new developments I see in my travels. Peridon (talk) 21:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not notable enough to stay. TML (talk) 16:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment What is the gross leasable area of the shopping center? That is helpful in gauging notability. Do references in the local language exist? Edison (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually all in Turkish that I've found. The first in English (from Page 8 of a Gsearch) is http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=9QTFLWD5g4wC&pg=PA137&lpg=PA137&dq=%22Karina+evleri%22&source=bl&ots=SsvxzVsjf4&sig=EC-J37QV2ukcUHrKx4TYeWrq814&hl=en&ei=UEZlTdzdK4Sy8gOKuum9Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEcQ6AEwBjhG#v=onepage&q=%22Karina%20evleri%22&f=false (I'm sure they don't need all that twiddle in the URL...). Peridon (talk) 17:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per WP:RS and WP:N. Monterey Bay (talk) 05:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No one has found evidence it satisfies WP:N. Edison (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.