The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

K Rend

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No good independent refs that show notability outside its own professional niche. Fails WP:CORP Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability missing, searched for secondary sources didn't turn up anything. Bryce Carmony (talk) 14:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per author's request. Not a notable company. -- haminoon (talk) 10:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.