The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KVR-pixojet

[edit]
KVR-pixojet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable company. The article is written like spam, and this Google search yields only the company's own website. — Wenli (reply here) 17:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, maybe speedy (criteria G11). - Snigbrook 02:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.