- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
KSL Capital Partners[edit]
- KSL Capital Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:ADVERT / Deletion policy #4. WP:NCORP. Re-recreated after two AFDs and I believe it merits DELETE & SALT. The last two AFDs closed with solid delete. Sources are still horrendous. It still looks advert. Graywalls (talk) 09:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and Colorado. Graywalls (talk) 09:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete and SALT: Agree with nom. Nowhere near notable enough to pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. User:Let'srun 12:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Speedy keep. --HongKongLewis2828ep (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Delete and SALT: Agree with nom. Not notable enough to pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Equine-man (talk) 14:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - Equine-man (talk · contribs) is wrong. Needs WP:CLEANUP but worth it. RepublicanParty-Lucia-Kwamkior9202 (talk) 14:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Sockpuppet votes struck by — Trey Maturin™ 14:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete and SALT per nom and others. Thoroughly fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt due to the article having not changed significantly since the last two nominations. Partofthemachine (talk) 02:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is an easy call. Note notable by any measure. Go4thProsper (talk) 03:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to no notability Elttaruuu (talk) 14:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A company that bought almost every major Colorado ski resort on its face alone is notable. The company has investments in major resorts across the country. There are 34 resorts that link to this article and that should indicate notability. My interest in doing the article was because of its involvement with the Blade helicopter service which has generated mountains of press in New York City because of its fights over helicopter service between the city and the Hamptons. The company is actually a major player in redeveloping the Hamptons. If you do not like the article that can be changed. Nominations for deletion are about the notability of the company and not about the article. I can assure you I am in no way associated with the company. I researched it because I was curious about its history. Americasroof (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2023 (
- Comment I would think that according to WP:INHERITORG, owning lots of resort is NOT "on its face alone" notable. I've searched and I am finding a lots of acquisition/purchase announcements and a mountain of press releases, particularly on "hospitalitynet" Graywalls (talk) 20:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Any nefarious paid editing should not determine whether we have article on these guys.
- —A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 16:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.