The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KGOC Global

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I question whether this organization passes the WP:CORPDEPTH test for businesses. An assertion from its own website that the business was established in 1958 is an assertion that needs independent third party verification

I note that

In 2015, the WP:REDIRECT Kangaro to Kangaroo was effectively "aticle hijacked" to be about a stationary business
In 2016, a WP:DRAFT for a named subsidiary was declined and deleted.

As always, please do prove me wrong. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.