The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tehrik-e-Istiqlal. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Justice Party (Pakistan)

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD-ed (Why should I have a User Name?) and de-PROD-ed (Soman) in 2014. My source searches don't show the requisite depth of coverage in independent, reliable sources to pass WP:NORG. I'm also open to a redirect to Tehrik-e-Istiqlal, but as it has already been PROD-ed I'm opting to discuss it. SITH (talk) 13:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is a brutally google unfriendly title. Do we have it in Urdu? Trying to separate it both from the general words and also its successor is making me lack any confidence in an actual BEFORE judgement. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This search finds a few reliable-looking sources confirming some basic facts. A merge with Asghar Khan might be better than one with Tehrik-e-Istiqlal, because this seems to have been a vehicle for his personal ambitions rather than a broad-based party. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~~Merge/~~Redirect with Tehrik-e-Istiqlal. Not enough sources to confirm independent notability, seems more sensible to add it to the Tehrik-e-Istiqlal article, which this article claims to be a fore-runner of. 12 years on and the article still lacks a single reference. Britishfinance (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given the material is unsourced, it is not worth merging, just Redirect. Britishfinance (talk) 10:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 07:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, per nom. Legion X (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.