The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Junichi Watanabe (footballer, born 1988)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballer played 3 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 80 AFD discussions (50 of which are accessible through the AFD link above) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. And mind you, I declined to nominate the players with 6 or 7 league games for deletion. Geschichte (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 17:42, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 17:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is clear consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. Giant Snowman 22:07, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG, so nom's rationale holds up. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.