The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW Bad faith nomination by confirmed sock of site-banned user. Favonian (talk) 18:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julio Sadorra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability and Very small 2 lines article Vushakiran (talk) 05:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It's not in any way official wikipedia policy, but the consensus at WikiProject Chess is that any chess player who achieves the title of Grandmaster is notable. Also, the current state of the article is irrelevant. Discussion should focus on notability. MaxBrowne (talk) 09:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural note I have re-opened this discussion after it was improperly closed via NAC. Primefac (talk) 17:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.