The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Juice Box Job Scheduler[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable software package; only primary references discuss Juice Box and no other references found. Page was previously deleted at AfD (for porn-link spam which isn't in this version), so no PROD. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. The independent refs are a microsoft page which doesn't mention Juice Box, and a personal blog which does not meet WP:RS. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. As above, this was previously deleted. Dialectric (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article created by the same editor who created the previous deleted version, and containing no sources which address the problems identified in the previous deletion debate. The article text merely describes features and contains no claim to encyclopaedic notability. Nor are my searches finding better. Fails WP:NSOFT, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 11:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.