The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G4, obvious attempt to evade the salting of the correct title. Salt will be applied here. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Johnathan Yesson (rapper)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/DJ JY (Artist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I don't personally care about whether this article stays on Wikipedia or not, I doubt much has changed since the previous deletion discussion, concluding that this individual is not notable in his field. Please note there was probably good reason to salt the original title (see log at Johnathan Yesson). Jared Preston (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note failed submission of Draft:DJ JY and the author's COI. Jared Preston (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jared I conceive the article is best placed under the artists actual stage name Draft:DJ JY. Perhaps Johnathan Yesson would best serve as a redirect to DJ JY which this artist is better known as. I actually created this page (Johnathan Yesson) whilst editing Draft:DJ JY and I'm a relatively new user so didn't know which was best, hopefully you can help resolve all this and in turn maybe I can pick a few things up from you about editing and get my first page created --NoobDude (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now at best and draft & userfy as my searches found nothing better and this article currently has nothing else convincing for notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. G4 - recreation of previously deleted material. Szzuk (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.