The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Herostratus 12:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Lear[edit]

John Lear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notability. Limited objective evidence of claims. Bregence 15:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Short of being the son of someone famous and being a complete nut, I don't see anything notable about him. The sources given on the page are not what I would consider reliable, and I am unable to find reliable ones in my own search. For anyone checking out the sources, please note that the "Project Camelot" reference is not to the Project Camelot, just to a website a couple of people started. Someguy1221 06:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non notable mentalist. Nick mallory 09:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable. Ciaranc 10:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable. --Plumbago 13:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. The level of crankiness may itself be notable, as with John Cleves Symmes, Jr. or Koresh. He has had media attention, I see. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Just enough media attention to qualify. DGG 04:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable. Indrian 08:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.