The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jockvale Road

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local road lacking notability. Article is un-sourced and makes no explicit claim of notability. Without a substantive reason of some kind of significance (political, social, cultural, etc.), a local road is just an instance of WP:MILL. MB 04:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is a completely irrelevant local road. It fails WP:GEOROAD this way. I tried to find some reliable sources about the road itself but all I could find are some businesses and addresses situated on that road. There are some news in newspapers/pages which mention the road in passing when some events happened on or near that road. Examples are police chases or accidents, but those article never deal with the road itself, it is just mentioned to give the reader the information where the event happened. There is no significant coverage of this subject itself which would satisfy WP:GNG. The article should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary (talk) 10:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—fails WP:GNG. If deleted, Template:Attached KML/Jockvale Road should be deleted as well. Imzadi 1979 → 12:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.