The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joca (footballer, born 1998)

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL. Footballer whose professional play only consists of 71 minutes (no cup matches). Plays on the fourth tier without having broken through there either. Geschichte (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and GS above. Nowhere near GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose passes NFOOTY, and has active semi-pro career.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you so concerned with NFOOTY? Have you not seen the 100+ AFDs that support this deletion proposal? Geschichte (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There doesn't seem any credible denial of the claims by nom and GS. As far as WP:NFOOTY, at the top of that guideline's page, it's noted that NFOOTY is merely a rule of thumb; passing it does not mean that an article must be kept. Given the facts of this case, deletion is the way to go. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.