The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Varsalone

[edit]

Contested CSD with notability concerns. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 05:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep book and chapters seem a significant contribution. Article in need of much work. JJL (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JJL - I rewote the article because you said it needed a lot of work. Does it look better now or is it still in need of more work. - Jesse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fastriser (talk • contribs) 01:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it still isn't really in article form--it's more like a resume. It should be readable, like an encyclopedia article. As below, WP:COI is a concern too. JJL (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Self-promotion and fails WP:BIO and WP:N. No independent sources referenced. --Sc straker (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on the absence of some indications that the study guides and the like which he wrote are significant.DGG (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.