The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. A merger discussion can continue elsewhere and doesn't require relisting with virtually nil participation. Star Mississippi 02:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Lewis Choose Love Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 15:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Connecticut. Shellwood (talk) 16:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Social science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reference from Today^[1] and the reference from People^[2] are both very reliable and solid references. This page is notable. It could surely be improved, but nominator has chosen to systematically nominate to delete any article I have submitted in a motivated approach or ulterior motive other than objectivity.Stravensky (talk) 22:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Stravensky and think the article should be kept. The two sources above both pass the 5 primary WP:NCORP criteria. The today article is not the most substantive, more of a profile of the founder, but it makes more than a passing mention of the program and SEL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Groceryheist (talk • contribs) 00:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Both of those references indicate that Jesse Lewis Choose Love Movement has been founded satisfying WP:V, but there are passing mention at best. That is best you can say about the organisation in these two references. Both of these references fail WP:SIRS. I'll go through the rest of the references later. scope_creep^Talk 00:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It may be beneficial for anyone else to go through the references instead, given your apparent conflict of interest based on nominating any page submitted by me on the grounds of weak references when you clearly haven't yet reviewed any of the references. Stravensky (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Also, "passing mention at best" is a long ways off, for anyone who actually reads either of the above articles which are in depth about Scarlett and Choose Love Movement. This is an obvious motivated action by someone who is motivated to delete my contributions without regard for objectivity. Stravensky (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Scarlett Lewis, alternate merge target Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. —siroχo 06:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.