The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Forrest Gump. WjBscribe 00:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny Curran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article is pure plot summary and offers nothing that isn't already in the Forrest Gump article. I had previously suggested that this article be merged into Forrest Gump, but the fact is that any relevant information is already there in that article. Hnsampat 14:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect if all notable (and non-copyright vio re level of detail) is in the main article just redirec it. Madmedea 15:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect and speedy close, there's no real issue here. --Dhartung | Talk 07:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.