The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Mundale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Philosopher who is an associate professor at the University of Central Florida. She has published some articles and some book chapters. She was one of 4 editors of a book, the lead editor being her PhD supervisor. Publishing and editing is what academics do and there appears to be nothing out of the ordinary here. A Google search did not turn up anything additional. Web of Science lists 10 publications, with a total number of citations of 99 and an h-index of 3. Does not meet WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 16:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. The article says she "notably co-edited" something, but that seems somewhat oxymoronic to me. If that's the best we can say about her, then we're probably better off saying nothing. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:25, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WoS gives a similar story, listing 3 papers (h-index 2). One of these from 1999 is pretty-well cited, but it was written with her advisor and he is listed as the corresponding author. It's pretty clear that she hasn't done anything substantial in terms of scholarship apart from her advisor, so I would say there's no basis for claiming notability here. Thx, Agricola44 (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.