The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. Procedural close Monty ₈₄₅ 17:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Horn

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Running for office and losing does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has BLP issues, and generally needs improvement, but I think the subject is clearly notable. A major party nominee for the US House couldn't avoid generating sufficient media coverage to pass WP:GNG even if they tried. The article does not currently contain the sources to show that it does meet GNG, but if anyone cared to, I'm confident they could improve it to do so. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - the BLP issues have been addressed. I've had no problem finding sourced material to put in the article, and will continue to work on it. GregJackP Boomer! 17:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep given the availability of sources, although at the moment she is primarily known as running for office. This article in The Keene Sentinel is useful for filling in the gaps in her biography. At the moment the WP article lacks any biography at all and is simply an account of her political activities. Voceditenore (talk) 17:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator withdrawn This article looks fine now. Gtwfan52 (talk) 17:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.