The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Unnecessary glorification of caste. See WP:FANCRUFT. None of the cited sources give any importance to the caste. There is also blatant violation of BLPs across this article because as per WP:CASTEID it is necessary for the subject to state their caste in their own words. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Lead of this article promotes this caste and fails to meet encyclopedic standards and other information violates BLP policy per WP:CASTEID. Based on the current content of the article, it appears that the intention behind creating this article was solely to glorify a particular caste. This is not the first time TheSlumPanda has done this; they have previously promoted caste here. Looking at their editing history, it seems they have mainly focused on caste-related articles. I am worried they might not be familiar with WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:GSCASTE. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)