The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Gordon-Cumming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing to be said about this person other than that she exists, has held some mid-rung positions in some non-notable organizations, and (like millions of other people), has written some short stories that have apparently drawn no particular notice. bd2412 T 20:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Doesn't appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines specifically WP:AUTHOR which is typically met with multiple independent book reviews in reliable sources. -- GreenC 03:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- The number of redlinks for her anthologies says it all. If she were notable, she would get into anthologies with other notable people, or get her own stand-alone works published. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.