The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep notability is no more needed here than in articles on towns, villages or counties, where notability doesn't need to be asserted. Of course, I expect some asinineangelic closing admin to completely ignore my comments. Noroton 12:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC) (edited to reflect a more considered opinion of our administrator overlords. Noroton13:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
comment If there is to be a policy change there are two ways to do it--one is to actually propose it on a policy page and get consensus. the other is to be so convincing here that it becomes accepted de facto. Otherwise, better to concentrate on supporting the ones that do appear particularly notable and finding sources for the others so they areDGG (talk) 00:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sign of notability, and I've not known junior highs to fall under the "assumed notability" that seems to grace high schools. SamBC03:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.