The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There seems to be a consensus that the sources provided do not meet the standards of the WP:GNG, and that there are no other reasons to keep the article. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jana Sanderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sanderson does not meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia. Her one claim to fame is winning Miss Alabama, and that is not a high enough honor to confer notability. The coverage bears this out. There is minimal coverage of that win. Beyond that we have coverage from the Gadsden Times, including things like her wedding annoucement. This is not the level of coverage that raises an article to notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unscintillating (talk) 06:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 12:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article contains copy such as:
  • "Her family includes her mother Judy, an elementary school teacher, sisters Jill and Margie, and brothers Marcus and John.[2][11][14]"
This is a hallmark of a WP:PSEUDO BLP, and this article should be correspondingly deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • You mean, "...correspondingly merged as per WP:PSEUDO".  The problem is that without editors here volunteering to do the merge, the editors with experience in this topic area are preferring standalone pages.  This is exactly one of the reasons that content disputes, such as this one, don't belong at AfD.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.