The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Due to low participation, this article may be undeleted on request at WP:REFUND. Mz7 (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jamia Islamia Darul Uloom Madania

[edit]
Jamia Islamia Darul Uloom Madania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the article is unsourced, and the sources that are cited are abysmal: an entry on a telephone list, the school's dead website, and an internet forum post. I considered redirecting to the community, Jatrabari Thana, but there's nothing that sets this madrasa apart from the other 67 in the area.[1] (in Bengali) Indeed, although searches found passing mentions of Jatrabari Madrasa,[2] and of Jamia Islamia Darul Uloom Madania,[3] (in Bengali), no source is deep enough to tell whether the two names even represent the same school, as claimed. The bottom line is that subject does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGDEPTH, or WP:NSCHOOL. Worldbruce (talk) 01:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 01:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 01:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What is the significance of this place that it belongs in an encyclopedia?Freetheangels (talk) 19:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE (talkcontributions) 09:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.