The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yash! 17:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jade Mills (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Listed sources still consist of nothing else but clear PR, announcements, interviews and listings, none of which establish notability and substance, even something genuine, let alone something fully acceptable; this itself was started by a vandalismfarm and my own searches find the mirrored sources, so there's no hopes of meaningful improvements here, even if someone boldly wished for them. As for the "#1" award, it seems it's a common enough occurrence that it's still too trivial and still only exists for clear PR. This itself has then not actually changed since said vandalism happened, hence not convincing either. SwisterTwister talk 17:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep [1][2] [3] [4] These are all reliable sources (Fox News, Forbes etc.), so I think she just passes WP:GNG. Selling $1 Billion worth of homes is an awful lot and I think a bit of WP:COMMONSENSE should be used here. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 18:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The subject has a good flow of reliable sources. However, the article's tone needs a bit of work as it sounds like an advertisement or a PR story. Scorpion293 (talk) 20:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The size and scope of her business is a rather strong claim of notability; the reliable and verifiable sources indisputably about her support the claim. Neither past vandalism nor PR are valid excuses for deletion. Alansohn (talk) 03:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.