The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JTJ Technologies

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the references in this article link to reliable sources. A web search does not lead to any reliable sources for the subject of this article. The article does not make any claim of notability. The article Lovkesh kumar was already speedily deleted. The primary author of the article is also the primary author of Lovkesh Kumar and Book Transport which appear to be similarly non-notable and which have also been nominated for deletion. SchreiberBike talk 07:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CORP. This is one among several spam articles created by User:Tarachandi. Salih (talk) 07:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no evidence that this firm has attained notability. A list of prizes won by the firm's principals before they formed this firm (indeed some childhood prizes) does not help demonstrate notability, and indeed adds to the feeling of a set of walled-garden articles. AllyD (talk) 06:02, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.