The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus seems to hold that this individual has received sufficient coverage to be notable in his own right. ~ mazca ^talk 10:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JME Adenuga[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Only references are to a blog site and a Youtube video. Searches do not provide useful results. The band/label (Boy Better Know) that this artist fronts does not appear notable in its own right and has been separately nominated for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Previous deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JME (rapper)

Delete per nom. Fails WP:MUSIC. VQuakr (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Put the article back into the article incubator, again. TDW ✉ 10:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Incubation would imply that this article might be improved by more work. If I had felt that was the case, I wouldn't have nominated for deletion in the first place. The problem isn't that the article is poor, but that the subject is non-notable. If there is a chance that he might become notable in the future, than an article can be created about him then. If Trap The Drum Wonder (talk · contribs) feels that his work on this article might be lost, he is free to create a user space draft in anticipation of any future notability of JME. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, appears to meet requirements of general notability guideline. Coverage exists, but is not cited in article. More notable as musician than as member of group. snigbrook (talk) 12:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If coverage exists, can you please provide links, preferably as references in the article? I have not been able to find significant reliable coverage, which is why I nominated in the first place. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Some coverage does exist, and I've added a few sources just now. JME is cited (by more than one British newspaper) as a prime example of an artist in the grime music scene. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If and when this article is changed to satisfactory standards, I would like to propose that the page be moved to Jamie Adenuga. The artist's stagename is 'JME' and his real name is 'Jamie Adenuga' - not the acronym followed by his surname. TDW ✉ 21:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:COMMONNAME I'd say it should be at JME (rapper) or JME (musician) because the sources I found refer to him simply as JME. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:05, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - As you insist. JME (rapper) will go in sync with Wiley (rapper). TDW ✉ 00:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ mazca ^talk 11:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned in the nomination, I'd suggest that this article's fate is clearly intertwined with the related AfD for Boy Better Know, which I've also just relisted. Further comments to evaluate whether the sourcing improvements made are sufficient would be useful here. ~ mazca ^talk 11:43, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Notability has been established since nomination. (Accepting sources in good faith.) Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎ 16:00, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep — This is a ridiculous nom in my opinion. JME is an extremely notable figure - a "CEO", if you will - within the Grime scene. Plenty of RS sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] Crashandspin (talk) 13:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.