The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect as this is enough (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JAI (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject may be notable someday, but the language hasen't even finished undergoing development. Ethanlu121 (talk) 16:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete "work in progress" says it all here. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Jonathan Blow#Other work where it is mentioned and sourced. That this language is being worked on is verifiable, but without a spec or implementation, there isn't much coverage beyond that. Worth a mention at the creator's article. --Mark viking (talk) 23:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Mark viking and add an entry at the Jai DAB page. Tigraan (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Mark viking. SJK (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.