The result was no consensus. Whether the content has merit with respect to sourcing etc. is a content question and even if I had an opinion about it, I would not be allowed to let it influence this closure. On this basis, we have no consensus about whether to delete the article because of its alleged content deficiencies. But this disagreement can be solved editorially through talk page discussion about whether (and to which extent) to merge or redirect the article to Islamization of Jerusalem. Sandstein 05:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article is WP:SYNTH. The only two sources which mentions "islamization" in this context are the highly partisan Bat Ye'or and the former Israeli mayor of Jerusalem, Teddy Kollek. The article is also the work of banned user. Frederico1234 (talk) 16:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Fred, the subject was not "fabricated" - it's a legitimate topic and an article was created albeit by a sock but in this case it does not negate the topic. In fact the Islamization article itself needs lots of work but its contents validate this article just as it validates many other "Islamization" articles such as Islamization in Iran, Islamization of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Islamization of Palestine, Islamization of the Temple Mount, Islamization of Syria, Islamization of Egypt etc, so while it needs improvement, it is a worthy topic. IZAK (talk) 08:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fred, you seem to be ignoring facts of history. For a start, see Occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem by Jordan#Jordanian occupation: