The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Roswell High. RL0919 (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel Evans

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All citations are from the series, probably lacks a lot of notability. Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 20:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 20:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable fictional character.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:00, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Roswell High. I love the original show, but it does not look like there is enough coverage from reliable, third-party sources to meet the notability requirements. However, with that said, this is still a viable search term, and I think a redirect to the book series, which was the basis for both television adaptations, would be preferable than outright deletion. The character is already named and discussed in the article on the books. Aoba47 (talk) 23:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Roswell High. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG on its own.4meter4 (talk) 18:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.