The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, this was deleted throug the AfD process and twice recreated in the last few hours, it should go through the WP:DRV process rather than be recreated repeatedly. It is now salted. Dougweller (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irving Quant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Second nomination. Local magician lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. References are all local in nature. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. ttonyb (talk) 02:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - He isn't a local magician and is very well known worldwide. Articles are published and referenced better than other magicians in this encyclopedia. Please do your full research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abriotelon (talk • contribs) 03:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – As noted above the article individual lacks GHits and GNEWS of substance. Please provide support for WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE using reliable sources.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.