The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:08, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iron League

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional organisation. No evidence of real-world notability, no secondary sources cited. The article has been tagged as being in-universe and having sourcing problems since 2013. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking independent sourcing. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable enough at this point in time per GNG. ~riley (talk) 00:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.