The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Irmgard von Stephani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure this person is notable enough. Of the three sources here, one is the GRG table E which doesn't actually list her (not a good start), the second is a dead link and the third here doesn't seem like a reliable source (it's actually a copyright violation from Der Spiegel which is a reliable source. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete/merge As usual, I prefer the WP:NOPAGE route where applicable. Apparently there's absolutely nothing to say about his person (notable or not) other than where she was born and where she died. EEng (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not notable. Just getting old does not impart notability. Legacypac (talk) 22:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.