The result was delete. Single "keep" opinion does not address the primary issue of notability. Owen× ☎ 12:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The subject lacks coverage in multiple published secondary sources. Moreover, I can find no evidence that any of the WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF criteria are met. From the five links provided, Popa (and beware, there are many Ioan Popas running around) is mentioned in just two. This one is a sale page for his books, and obviously not a reliable (or quotable) source. This one is the Tismăneanu Report, and while it's interesting that one of his works is cited in one footnote of the report's 666 pages, that doesn't imply significant coverage of Popa.
Furthermore, I should note that while there's no reason to believe any of this article's claims, given that they're unsourced, I would note that they don't always show notability in any case. For instance, he's allegedly a member of the Writers' Union, but it has previously been noted that membership is no big deal, and no substantive factor toward a writer's notability. - Biruitorul Talk 21:16, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]