The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 16:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International adaptations of Tokyo Mew Mew

[edit]

Nedelessly excessive amount of indiscriminate information about the various non-English translations of an anime. The Manual of Style for anime and manga articles recommend that non-English release information should be transwikied to a respective language's Wiki, and there's precedent for deleting articles detailing non-notable translation differences. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 23:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While the topic itself may very well be notable, WP:MOS-AM's wording was to limit the indiscriminate listing of every VA who voiced a particular character or every company that licensed the anime or manga. However, the problem with this article is that it simply lists the stations that the series was broadcast on and variations of the characters' names from country to country. What little prose is on the article is mostly original research or entirely unsourced. While the title says International adaptations of Tokyo Mew Mew, it actually doesn't tell how the series was adapted by other countries. --Farix (Talk) 22:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in keeping with standards. General discussion on other language releases belongs in Tokyo Mew Mew. This article is excessively detailed and completely unsourced, possibly WP:OR and WP:NPOV. English adaptations of Tokyo Mew Mew should also be deleted for the same reasons. Collectonian (talk) 04:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It is almost entirely original research and is uncited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seicer (talk • contribs) 06:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.