The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft delete. LFaraone 00:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International Preschool Curriculum[edit]

International Preschool Curriculum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable The organization appears to be commercial, rather than the international association it purports to be. There are no citations provided to anything outside of the company website. A Google scholar search of the name yields a single minor reference in a book chapter. hgilbert (talk) 14:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. They almost take the words right out of my mouth.--Beachsand2004 (talk) 20:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• This !vote has been struck as coming from a sockpuppet account. See this SPI. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No citations provided to anything outside of the official website of the company. I worry about the accuracy of the information.Knight of Gloucestershire (talk) 20:45, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.