The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No other than the nominator !voted delete, one keep !vote plus nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

International Institute of Refrigeration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has had a tag on it for 33 months and I am beginning to wonder if this is the same company as Institute of Refrigeration. Launchballer 15:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - concerns allayed.--Launchballer 07:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It appears to be a reputable, innocuous international organization. It produces a journal on refrigeration, International Journal of Refrigeration, that is published by Elsevier, per http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-refrigeration/. AFD is not suitable for calls for cleanup, or for speculation. --doncram 01:47, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is for notability tags, I should've been clearer in my message. My point was that other article had been deleted as non-notable at AfD.--Launchballer 09:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the International Institute of Refrigeration is not the same as the Institute of Refrigeration. One has a respected journal. Other has a newsletter. Clear from short time browsing Google. I think the nom is mistaken. --doncram 11:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In which case I am happy to withdraw this, though I want answers regarding its notability tag.--Launchballer 11:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Call for closure with Keep then, the nomination is withdrawn and there are no !votes for deletion. --doncram 09:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Um, how do I do that?--Launchballer 09:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How an AFD discussion is closed, it is explained that a nominator can close a discussion under current situation (that no votes for deletion are present). Follow instructions there. If instructions there are not sufficient, please ask for guidance at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion (and point out how you find the instructions inadequate, if you do find them inadequate). It would be a service saving time of others likely to come consider this case in the next days and/or weeks, if you would figure it out and close this properly. Sincerely, --doncram 02:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.