The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this company does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International Artists Records[edit]

International Artists Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not related to the 1960s Houston, Texas indie label International Artists. Unreferenced ever since it was created by an owner of the company in 2013.[1] Searches of the usual Google types, EBSCO, Gale, HighBeam, JSTOR, newspapers.com, and ProQuest found a single one-sentence mention.[2] Does not meet WP:GNG. Worldbruce (talk) 01:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- unreferenced and promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I would have thought, collecting classical on vinyl as I do, that a label producing classical music in the USA since 1956 would have shown up sometime, but I've never ever never seen it. I can't find anything but directory listings for references. Must be distributed very locally. Does not appear to meet any definition of notability. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As a record label, coverage of it is virtually non-existent—it gets a mention here in a local NYC magazine from 1975 and the main person behind it, Mark Andersen, is covered in this article in a local newspaper for Lumberton, North Carolina. There are a couple of very obscure holdings listed in WorldCat OCLC 30847587, OCLC 30847696 and ...er.. that's it. Voceditenore (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.